<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Armchair Psychologist to the Conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/</link>
	<description>There’s a thin line between normal and insane. I think I’m standing on it… which would explain the big blob of crazy on my shoe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: demarcationville</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>demarcationville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Thank you all so much for the comments.

To nm:  I do believe there&#039;s hatred rooted in the patriarchal belief system, which conservatives have inherited.  I don&#039;t think they recognize it as such. They believe they are upholding morality and working to create a better and &quot;righteous&quot; world.  They&#039;ve given very little thought as to how or why women get continuously screwed in their version of righteousness.

Ease access to birth control and provide children with information about safe sex? Are you kidding? They can&#039;t do that.  It would condone - perhaps  even promote premarital sex, which is also immoral.

See, the thought process here is circular.  You cannot sway a true conservative with logic or fact because they will always revert back to the &quot;moral&quot; argument.  This is why most attempts at discussion leaves one feeling as though they&#039;ve bashed their head into a brick wall  (and somewhat relieved these people aren&#039;t still stoning us to death.)

to bellacoker:  I agree. Direct hatred would be much easier to identify and move beyond. This moral superiority, however, is so entrenched in the conservative psyche I think the daughters of our daughters will still be trying to  bump them from the hamster-wheel of godliness inside their head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all so much for the comments.</p>
<p>To nm:  I do believe there&#8217;s hatred rooted in the patriarchal belief system, which conservatives have inherited.  I don&#8217;t think they recognize it as such. They believe they are upholding morality and working to create a better and &#8220;righteous&#8221; world.  They&#8217;ve given very little thought as to how or why women get continuously screwed in their version of righteousness.</p>
<p>Ease access to birth control and provide children with information about safe sex? Are you kidding? They can&#8217;t do that.  It would condone &#8211; perhaps  even promote premarital sex, which is also immoral.</p>
<p>See, the thought process here is circular.  You cannot sway a true conservative with logic or fact because they will always revert back to the &#8220;moral&#8221; argument.  This is why most attempts at discussion leaves one feeling as though they&#8217;ve bashed their head into a brick wall  (and somewhat relieved these people aren&#8217;t still stoning us to death.)</p>
<p>to bellacoker:  I agree. Direct hatred would be much easier to identify and move beyond. This moral superiority, however, is so entrenched in the conservative psyche I think the daughters of our daughters will still be trying to  bump them from the hamster-wheel of godliness inside their head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bellacoker</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>bellacoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I really think I would prefer being hated to this sort of amorphous paternal disappointment you describe.  At least hatred is an emotional response to someone you see an an equal.

Also, I think that abortion is an easy choice for some women, I know that it was for me, and that that is okay too.  Just because one option is more difficult it does not mean that difficulty equals right.  If someone told you that you had a choice between going to a movie or setting yourself on fire there is no reason to believe that you would pause later, perhaps during your popcorn eating, and wonder if you should have immolated yourself because going to see the movie was the easy way out.

Thank you for your post, it was very though provoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think I would prefer being hated to this sort of amorphous paternal disappointment you describe.  At least hatred is an emotional response to someone you see an an equal.</p>
<p>Also, I think that abortion is an easy choice for some women, I know that it was for me, and that that is okay too.  Just because one option is more difficult it does not mean that difficulty equals right.  If someone told you that you had a choice between going to a movie or setting yourself on fire there is no reason to believe that you would pause later, perhaps during your popcorn eating, and wonder if you should have immolated yourself because going to see the movie was the easy way out.</p>
<p>Thank you for your post, it was very though provoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nm</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>nm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-564</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As far as most conservatives are concerned: women have a choice. They choose if they will or will not have sexual intercourse: they choose if they will or will not use birth control. If they chose poorly, they face consequences. If they refuse to accept responsibility and fulfill the basic obligations of womanhood - then they have failed.&lt;/i&gt;

I would be more impressed by this description of the conservative mindset if so many of the same people making it more difficult to obtain an abortion weren&#039;t also making it more difficult for kids to get accurate information about sexual intercourse and birth control, and making it more difficult for unmarried people (and some married people, too) to have access to birth control.

I mean, I&#039;m sure there are many whose mindset is as you describe it (complete with the overbearing overtones you point out of the ways they try to compensate for our terrible tendency to make bad choices), but there are even more, it seems to me, who are seriously devoted to making women suffer if we have sex for fun.

Very thought-provoking post, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As far as most conservatives are concerned: women have a choice. They choose if they will or will not have sexual intercourse: they choose if they will or will not use birth control. If they chose poorly, they face consequences. If they refuse to accept responsibility and fulfill the basic obligations of womanhood &#8211; then they have failed.</i></p>
<p>I would be more impressed by this description of the conservative mindset if so many of the same people making it more difficult to obtain an abortion weren&#8217;t also making it more difficult for kids to get accurate information about sexual intercourse and birth control, and making it more difficult for unmarried people (and some married people, too) to have access to birth control.</p>
<p>I mean, I&#8217;m sure there are many whose mindset is as you describe it (complete with the overbearing overtones you point out of the ways they try to compensate for our terrible tendency to make bad choices), but there are even more, it seems to me, who are seriously devoted to making women suffer if we have sex for fun.</p>
<p>Very thought-provoking post, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-563</guid>
		<description>I am a hard-core pro-choicer and this post made me want to stand up and cheer.  Thank you for this well thought out post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a hard-core pro-choicer and this post made me want to stand up and cheer.  Thank you for this well thought out post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things I Think Are Applicable to Other Things We&#8217;ve Talked About &#171; Tiny Cat Pants</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Things I Think Are Applicable to Other Things We&#8217;ve Talked About &#171; Tiny Cat Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-562</guid>
		<description>[...] Casey (kcb) on You Know, As Opposed to those Lazy&#160;Americans.jim voorhies on As You&#160;KnowArmchair Psychologist to the Conservatives &#171; DeMarCaTionVille on The Oklahoma Legislature are a Bunch of Sadistic&#160;Pervertsbridgett on You Know, As Opposed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Casey (kcb) on You Know, As Opposed to those Lazy&nbsp;Americans.jim voorhies on As You&nbsp;KnowArmchair Psychologist to the Conservatives &laquo; DeMarCaTionVille on The Oklahoma Legislature are a Bunch of Sadistic&nbsp;Pervertsbridgett on You Know, As Opposed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newscoma</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>newscoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-561</guid>
		<description>This is a great post. I&#039;m with Rachel, I love that line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post. I&#8217;m with Rachel, I love that line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Additional Musings on the Oklahoma Abortion Ultrasound Law &#171; Women&#8217;s Health News</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Additional Musings on the Oklahoma Abortion Ultrasound Law &#171; Women&#8217;s Health News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-560</guid>
		<description>[...] by Rachel on May 8, 2008  Demarcationville wins the internet today, with this piece inspired by Oklahoma&#8217;s new law requiring ultrasounds prior to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Rachel on May 8, 2008  Demarcationville wins the internet today, with this piece inspired by Oklahoma&#8217;s new law requiring ultrasounds prior to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://demarcationville.com/2008/05/08/armchair-psychologist-to-the-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demarcationville.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-559</guid>
		<description>&quot;You’re out of your jurisdiction. Seriously, ya’ll don’t know me like that.&quot; - Love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You’re out of your jurisdiction. Seriously, ya’ll don’t know me like that.&#8221; &#8211; Love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
